<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ice fishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.miscellaneoustalk.com/outdoors/ice-fishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.miscellaneoustalk.com/outdoors/ice-fishing/</link>
	<description>Astrological Love Signs Compatibility and Chinese Astrology Elements</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:49:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.miscellaneoustalk.com/outdoors/ice-fishing/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miscellaneoustalk.com/?p=72#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Fish finders are still controversial? To who, PETA? Real men use fish finders but they don&#039;t eat quiche. IMO the underwater cameras are much more controversial than fish finders. Lol, even GPS is more controversial than fish finders are now.

Nothing like being able to buy a map with the gps waypoints already marked on it. While it&#039;s made finding fish and finding spots where there might be fish, easier, none of the technology makes the fish bite.

IOW technology can help newbies to fishing find a ton of fish a lot easier than they could before, it doesn&#039;t mean people can catch the fish they may find.

I think the old timers who learned to fish and find fish without the technology have a huge advantage over those who rely on technology to put them on fish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fish finders are still controversial? To who, PETA? Real men use fish finders but they don&#8217;t eat quiche. IMO the underwater cameras are much more controversial than fish finders. Lol, even GPS is more controversial than fish finders are now.</p>
<p>Nothing like being able to buy a map with the gps waypoints already marked on it. While it&#8217;s made finding fish and finding spots where there might be fish, easier, none of the technology makes the fish bite.</p>
<p>IOW technology can help newbies to fishing find a ton of fish a lot easier than they could before, it doesn&#8217;t mean people can catch the fish they may find.</p>
<p>I think the old timers who learned to fish and find fish without the technology have a huge advantage over those who rely on technology to put them on fish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rapala Wood Crankbait Lures</title>
		<link>http://www.miscellaneoustalk.com/outdoors/ice-fishing/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Rapala Wood Crankbait Lures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miscellaneoustalk.com/?p=72#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean about technology changing fishing.  There sure is a lot of controversy about whether to use a fish finder or not.  Real men don&#039;t use them, right?

Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean about technology changing fishing.  There sure is a lot of controversy about whether to use a fish finder or not.  Real men don&#8217;t use them, right?</p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

